Comment on page
Aspect Binding
Since we have now mapped our aspect in WireBox, we now need to tell it the most important things:
- 1.To what classes or CFCs should we apply this aspect to?
- 2.To what methods or join points should we apply this aspect to?
We do this with another binder DSL method:
bindAspect(classes,methods,aspects)
bindAspect(classes=match().mappings('UserService'),methods=match().methods('save'),aspects="MethodLogger");
What is up with that funky
match().... stuff? Well, the classes and methods arguments of the bindAspect() call uses our AOP funky matcher methods that exist in an object called: wirebox.system.aop.Matcher. This matcher object is used to match classes and methods to whatever criteria you like. The binder has a convenience method called match() that creates a new matcher object for you and returns it so you can configure it for classes and method matching. Here are the most common matching methods below:Method | Class Matching | Method Matching | Description |
any() | true | true | Matches against any class path or method name |
returns(type) | false | true | Matches against the return type of methods |
annotatedWith(annotation,[value]) | true | true | Matches against the finding of an annotation in a cfcomponent or cffuntion or matches against the finding AND value of the annotation. |
mappings(mappings) | true | false | Matches to ONLY the named mapping(s) you pass to this method as a list or array. |
instanceOf(classPath) | true | false | Matches if the target object is an instance of the classPath. This internally uses the ColdFusion isInstanceOf() method |
regex(regex) | true | true | Matches against a CFC instantiation path or function name using regular expressions |
methods(methods) | false | true | Matches against a list of explicit method names as a list or array |
andMatch(matcher) | true | true | Does an AND evaluation with the current matcher and the one you pass in the method. |
orMatch(matcher) | true | true | Does an OR evaluation with the current matcher and the one you pass in the method. |
WOW! We can really pin point anything in our system! So now that we have binded our aspect to our UserService I can rewrite it to this:
component name="UserService"{
function save(){
transaction {
// do some work here
}
}
}
Now isn't that pretty? Much nicer and compact hugh! Plus I can reuse the method logger for ANY method in ANY class I desire (Muaaaahaaaa), that's an evil laugh by the way! But we are not done, let's keep going and do the Transactional aspect.
Last modified 1yr ago